Calendar of Events
Exhibits & Collections
Online Exhibits
Education
Oral History Center
Lighthouse Tours
Wedding Rentals
Children's Memorial
Catboat Charters
Internships
Volunteer Opportunities

Research
Library & Archives
Genealogy
Publications
Vineyard History FAQ

Membership &
Giving
Membership & Benefits
Become a Member
Giving


MENU > Intro > Biography > History > Photographs > Stereographs > Conclusion


Despite their relative isolation on the island, the Shute family quickly adopted almost all the technological innovations of photography that occurred during the late nineteenth century. For example they mastered the ambrotype (developed in 1854), which still produced a direct positive image on glass, but an image much easier to view than the daguerreotype. From 1855 the tintype, a direct positive image on metal, gained wider appeal and the Shutes quickly incorporated it into their photographic repertoire.

Up until that time, the Shutes had worked mainly with daguerreotypes. And like Samuel Morse and Mathew Brady (the photographer who went on to famously document the American Civil War), the Shutes produced a great deal of portrait photography. But 1851 witnessed the introduction of the wet plate process or collodion photography with its modern and efficient negative/positive process.

Like Brady, Shute and his father quickly adopted the new medium. But while Brady was guided by his plan to sell the Civil War images to the United States Congress, the Shutes oriented their work to the consumer market. While Richard G. Shute responded to national developments and trends, he also responded well to changes in customer interests and to his competitors on the island.

The generation following the Civil War witnessed many more photographic and artistic innovations. In 1871 dry photographic plates were introduced and mass-produced. By the end of the decade the paper photograph was introduced. But the art of photography began to develop as well. U.S. geographical surveys, geological surveys, and railroad companies came to produce landscape photography that suggested the opulent beauty of Asher B. Durand's canvases.

Shute's interest in unposed subjects, often sitting or walking about the beach, suggests the innovative style of his famous contemporary, Peter Henry Emerson, who published his Naturalistic Photography in 1889. Emerson argued that photography should mirror the phenomenological world as precisely as possible. And the publication of Emerson's aesthetic theory came just as Shute was beginning his most productive period. And interestingly enough, he too never seeks to transform the landscapes and seascapes of Martha's Vineyard.

Perhaps with the advent of magnesium flash lighting in 1878, Richard G. Shute found it possible to better record images of interiors too. He photographed the elegant drawing rooms and parlors of many of the historic Edgartown hotels. But he also documented the relative austerity of the Methodists' homes at Cottage City.

But for the most part Shute still emphasized the beauty of the island itself, a topic which certainly reflected the consumer trend toward a more naturalistic theme. And this is how he captured images for the rest of his career.

From the 1900's through the 1920's Shute seems to have remained oblivious to the whole Photo-Secession movement, which rejected photography's documentary value. The new movement employed a whole new printing process and argued for the manipulation and retouching of images. Photographs were to be transformed into works of art-even abstract art.

Richard G. Shute though lived out his days on the island, isolated from the new, extravagant movement. Also, with his limited formal education, he did not seem to ever take an interest. It is all the more reason his images remain so extraordinary in their power to document the island's transitions and history.


 

Copyright © Martha's Vineyard Museum - Martha's Vineyard Historical Society, MA. All rights reserved.
Web design by Martha's Vineyard Online Web Publishing, www.MVOL.com